81 Cal. L. Rev. 569 (2001)
by Professor Michele Estrin Gilman
Back to article || The new welfare landscape || Privitization and due process || Conclusion || Footnotes
1 Pub. L. No. 104-193, Sec. 104, 110 Stat. 2105 (1996) (codified in scattered sections of 42 U.S.C.).
2 LESTER M. SALAMON, PARTNERS IN PUBLIC SERVICE: GOVERNMENT-NONPROFIT RELATIONS IN THE MODERN WELFARE STATE 15 (1995).
3 RICHARD P. NATHAN AND THOMAS L. GAIS, IMPLEMENTING THE PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY ACT OF 1996: A FIRST LOOK 21(1999).
4 See Greg Garland, Lockheed Called Failure on Child Support Goals; State Announces Collection Contract Will Not Be Extended, BALT. SUN, Mar. 4, 1999, at 1B; Greg Garland, Collections of Child Aid Questioned; Lockheed IMS Defends Performance in State's Program; Contract Extension Sought; Lower-Paid Staff Part of Problem, Ex-Employees Say, BALT. SUN, Jan. 10, 1999, at 1B.
5 See JOHN D. DONAHUE, THE PRIVATIZATION DECISION 217 (1989)
6 Am. Mfrs. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Sullivan, 526 U.S. 40, 52, 55 (1999).